Mission: Impossible
1996
Model Confidence: 0.21
Loading...
×
Click card to flip
FILMBOT SCORE
7.96
Thriller: 7.66
Action: 8.46
Action / Fight Choreography / Stunts
8.72
Justification
Like a master illusionist, this film’s action choreography dazzles with its iconic vault drop and pulse-pounding train finale—precision, innovation, and Tom Cruise’s daredevil authenticity fuse into a genre-defining spectacle, even if it trades bone-crunching brawls for suspenseful, acrobatic spycraft. The camera’s clarity and the stunts’ sheer bravado ensure every set piece lands with the impact of a perfectly timed magic trick.
Individual Runs
8.71
8.65
8.79
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Ambition
7.23
Justification
Ambition here is a high-wire act: globe-trotting intrigue, audacious set pieces, and De Palma’s stylish fingerprints all over the celluloid, even if the film never quite dares to leap into deeper waters. It’s a slick, calculated blockbuster that swings for the fences with spectacle and narrative twists, but keeps its heart locked in the vault.
Individual Runs
7.3
7.22
7.16
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
CGI Effects
6.39
Justification
The CGI here is like a trusty understudy—rarely stealing the spotlight from the practical effects, but when called upon, it delivers serviceable, if not seamless, spectacle. While the tunnel sequence flirts with cartoonish physics and the digital seams now show their age, the effects never derail the action, instead providing just enough digital dazzle to keep the pulse racing without ever upstaging the film’s real stars: its stunts.
Individual Runs
6.64
6.61
5.91
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Casting
8.29
Justification
Tom Cruise and his IMF cohorts fit their roles like tailored tuxedos, delivering a cocktail of charisma, tension, and physicality that’s hard to resist—even if the casting leans a little too comfortably into 90s Hollywood’s pale, male mold. The chemistry crackles where it counts, and while diversity is more a garnish than a main course, the ensemble’s credibility and energy keep the mission thrillingly on target.
Individual Runs
8.26
8.39
8.22
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Characters
6.58
Justification
Ethan Hunt sprints ahead as a memorable, if not yet iconic, action hero, but his supporting cast are mostly shadows—functional, archetypal, and rarely more than cogs in the espionage machine. The film’s character work is serviceable and slick, but emotional resonance and depth are sacrificed at the altar of plot twists and spectacle, leaving only a faint afterimage of complexity behind the explosions.
Individual Runs
6.47
6.53
6.74
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Cinematography
8.6
Justification
De Palma’s lenswork in this film is a masterclass in suspenseful choreography—each frame is a chess move, every shadow a conspirator, and the camera glides through tension-soaked set pieces with the precision of a safecracker. While not reinventing the wheel, the cinematography’s stylish flourishes, layered compositions, and noirish lighting make the whole affair as visually gripping as a fuse burning toward detonation.
Individual Runs
8.6
8.68
8.53
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Colour Grading
7.93
Justification
The colour grading here is a masterclass in cool restraint—icy blues and greys cloak the film in espionage paranoia, never flashy but always consistent, like a well-tailored suit for a covert agent. While it doesn’t reinvent the spy palette, its technical polish and subtle mood shifts keep the tension simmering, even if the symbolism stays locked in the vault.
Individual Runs
7.95
7.92
7.93
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Continuity / Plot Holes
8.55
Justification
Like a master illusionist, this film dazzles with its intricate plotting and genre-defying stunts, rarely letting a continuity slip or plot hole break the spell—even if a few leaps in logic and improbable gadgets ask you to suspend disbelief higher than Tom Cruise dangling in the CIA vault. The result is a slick, tightly wound thriller whose minor narrative shortcuts are mere sleight of hand in an otherwise seamless spectacle.
Individual Runs
8.37
8.57
8.71
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Direction
8.05
Justification
Brian De Palma’s direction is a high-wire act of style and suspense, turning a labyrinthine script into a sleek, paranoid thrill ride—his Hitchcockian fingerprints are all over the visuals, even if emotional depth sometimes takes a back seat to spectacle. The result is a masterclass in tension and technical bravura, where even the convolutions feel like part of the funhouse.
Individual Runs
7.99
8.06
8.1
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Editing
8.43
Justification
Like a master illusionist, the editing here keeps the pulse racing and the audience guessing, slicing through action and intrigue with razor-sharp precision—while it doesn’t reinvent the genre’s wheel, its seamless pacing, taut continuity, and tension-laden cuts make for a slick, suspenseful ride that rarely lets up. Creativity may not be its boldest suit, but the craftsmanship is undeniable, delivering espionage thrills with clockwork efficiency
Individual Runs
8.39
8.42
8.48
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Execution Of Premise / Pitch / Concept
8.5
Justification
Like a master illusionist, the film takes its classic spy premise and spins it into a web of paranoia, double-crosses, and iconic set pieces, delivering thrills and spectacle that far outstrip its TV roots—even if the plot sometimes ties itself in knots and leaves emotional depth in the dust. The execution is sleek, stylish, and consistently engaging, proving that with the right flair, even a convoluted mission can be impossible to resist.
Individual Runs
8.51
8.5
8.49
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Hair & Make Up
7.93
Justification
The hair and make-up here are as slick and unassuming as a master spy in a crowded ballroom—never flashy, but always precise, with the latex mask trickery providing just enough flair to keep things interesting. While the transformations rarely dazzle, the subtlety and seamless integration with the film’s espionage world make the work quietly effective, if not revolutionary.
Individual Runs
7.96
7.88
7.95
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Immersion / Plausibility
8.09
Justification
This film plunges you into a world of cloak-and-dagger intrigue with the precision of a Swiss watch, maintaining a taut, immersive atmosphere even as it occasionally flirts with genre excess. While a few gadgets and death-defying escapes stretch credulity, the meticulous detail, brisk pacing, and unwavering tone keep the illusion alive—making for a slick, suspenseful ride that rarely lets reality get in the way of a good pulse-race.
Individual Runs
8.09
8.01
8.18
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Intangibles
7.82
Justification
Like a slickly tailored tuxedo, this film dazzles with its iconic set pieces and De Palma’s cool, paranoid mood, even if it keeps emotional depth at arm’s length. The vault heist is pure cinematic sorcery, and while the heartstrings aren’t plucked too hard, the franchise-launching charisma and suspenseful flair leave an indelible mark on action cinema.
Individual Runs
7.82
7.88
7.77
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Lead Acting
8.17
Justification
Tom Cruise vaults, sprints, and sweats his way through a role that’s more about steely nerves and physical bravado than Shakespearean soul-searching, anchoring the film with a performance that’s as taut and precise as a tripwire—iconic, if not always deeply layered, but undeniably magnetic.
Individual Runs
8.2
8.28
8.03
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Originality
7.36
Justification
While it doesn’t detonate the genre’s blueprints, this slick spy caper injects enough high-tech paranoia, visual bravado, and iconic set pieces to make its familiar premise feel freshly wired—De Palma’s fingerprints and that vault heist alone ensure it stands out from the crowd of ‘90s action clones.
Individual Runs
7.45
7.36
7.28
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Practical Effects / SFX
9.11
Justification
The practical effects here are a symphony of sweat, shattered glass, and wind-whipped chaos—so seamlessly woven into the action that reality itself seems to sweat alongside Tom Cruise. Even with a few digital stitches showing in the train sequence, the film’s tactile ingenuity and relentless craftsmanship make its set pieces pulse with a physicality that modern CGI-heavy blockbusters can only envy.
Individual Runs
9.07
9.13
9.13
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Predictability / Twists
7.91
Justification
This film’s twists are a well-oiled Rube Goldberg machine—unexpected yet meticulously set up, with betrayals and red herrings ricocheting through the plot to keep even seasoned spies guessing. While some genre tropes peek through the smoke, the audacious use of a legacy character as the villain and the clever foreshadowing ensure the surprises land with satisfying, pulse-quickening impact.
Individual Runs
8.05
7.98
7.71
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Premise / Concept
8.16
Justification
This premise crackles with intrigue, taking the familiar cloak-and-dagger formula and injecting it with a shot of paranoia and betrayal that made the spy genre feel fresh again in the '90s. While it doesn’t shatter the mold, its high-concept clarity, marketable hook, and franchise-ready DNA ensure it stands tall among its peers—like a fuse burning toward a dynamite payoff.
Individual Runs
8.05
8.1
8.34
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Production & Art Design
8.32
Justification
Production and art design here is a masterclass in sleek subterfuge—vaults gleam with clinical menace, Prague drips with shadowy intrigue, and every gadget feels plucked from a spy’s fever dream; while not revolutionary, the film’s tactile authenticity and iconic set pieces make it a blueprint for stylish espionage, even if its symbolism sometimes whispers rather than shouts.
Individual Runs
8.31
8.4
8.25
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Rewatchability
7.67
Justification
Like a well-oiled spy gadget, this film’s intricate plot and iconic set pieces keep the adrenaline pumping on repeat viewings—even if its emotional circuitry is a bit basic and the dialogue rarely crackles. The real thrill is in the stylish suspense and genre-defining action, which never seem to lose their charge, making it a rewatchable classic for fans who crave clever twists over deep character dives.
Individual Runs
7.79
7.57
7.64
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Score / Soundtrack
8.39
Justification
Danny Elfman’s score doesn’t just ride the coattails of Schifrin’s iconic theme—it turbocharges it, weaving complex orchestration and pulse-pounding suspense into the film’s DNA. While the main motif steals the spotlight and secondary themes lurk in the shadows, the soundtrack’s cultural impact and sheer adrenaline-fueled energy make it an enduring, genre-defining triumph.
Individual Runs
8.45
8.45
8.27
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Script / Screenplay / Dialogue
7.39
Justification
The script is a slick, well-oiled machine—brimming with clever twists and brisk pacing, but it sometimes trades clarity for complexity, leaving supporting characters as mere shadows in Ethan Hunt’s high-octane spotlight. Dialogue is sharp and functional, if rarely sparkling, and while the themes of trust and betrayal are woven throughout, they’re more surface-level intrigue than deep philosophical dive.
Individual Runs
7.38
7.49
7.29
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Sound Design / Audio Mix
8.16
Justification
The sound design here is a masterclass in precision—never flashy, but always razor-sharp—layering custom foley and immersive effects to ratchet up tension, especially in the vault and train sequences. While it doesn’t shatter genre boundaries or spawn iconic sound effects, the mix is so clean and dynamically modulated that it keeps your pulse racing and your ears glued to every whisper and explosion.
Individual Runs
8.21
8.03
8.23
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Story
7.87
Justification
This story is a high-wire act of espionage, expertly structured and brimming with tension, even if its twists sometimes tie themselves in knots and its emotional depth barely skims the surface. While it borrows liberally from genre conventions and stretches plausibility, the relentless pace, clever set pieces, and globe-trotting intrigue keep the pulse racing and the audience hooked.
Individual Runs
7.86
7.93
7.83
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Support Acting
7.36
Justification
The supporting cast here is a gallery of cool professionals—Redgrave’s sly Max and Rhames’ stoic Luther steal scenes with subtlety, while Voight’s Phelps delivers a late-game twist with icy restraint. While no one swings for the fences emotionally, their collective chemistry and crisp performances keep the espionage engine humming, even if the script rarely lets them break a sweat.
Individual Runs
7.48
7.31
7.3
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Themes / Commentaries
6.56
Justification
Like a well-oiled spy gadget, the film’s themes of trust and betrayal click neatly into place, but don’t expect them to explode with deeper resonance—this is a slick, genre-faithful thriller more interested in dazzling you with double-crosses than provoking any post-mission soul-searching. The commentary is as subtle as a whisper in a crowded train station: present, but never the main event.
Individual Runs
6.65
6.91
6.13
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters
Wardrobe / Costume
8.71
Justification
Like a master spy in a tailored suit, the costuming here is sleek, functional, and perfectly camouflaged—never flashy, but always sharp, serving the story with subtle precision and a dash of iconic flair (that vault scene harness, anyone?). While it won’t set fashion runways ablaze, the wardrobe’s authenticity and attention to espionage detail keep the film’s pulse racing and its characters believably undercover.
Individual Runs
8.71
8.75
8.68
Community Sentiment
0 votes
Get your first Filmbot Card to vote on parameters